Anonymous

Item talk:Q55419: Difference between revisions

From geokb
Wrote fresh schema.org document to item wiki page
(Added abstract and other texts to publication item's discussion page for reference)
 
(Wrote fresh schema.org document to item wiki page)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Integrated rangeland fire management strategy actionable science plan completion assessment: Invasives topic, 2015–20 =
{"@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "CreativeWork", "additionalType": "USGS Numbered Series", "name": "Integrated rangeland fire management strategy actionable science plan completion assessment: Invasives topic, 2015\u201320", "identifier": [{"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "USGS Publications Warehouse IndexID", "value": "ofr20231003", "url": "https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20231003"}, {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "USGS Publications Warehouse Internal ID", "value": 70240264}, {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "DOI", "value": "10.3133/ofr20231003", "url": "https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231003"}], "inLanguage": "en", "isPartOf": [{"@type": "CreativeWorkSeries", "name": "Open-File Report"}], "datePublished": "2023", "dateModified": "2023-06-27", "abstract": "Loss and degradation of sagebrush rangelands due to an accelerated invasive annual grass-wildfire cycle and other stressors are significant management, conservation, and economic issues in the western United States. These sagebrush rangelands comprise a unique biome spanning 11 states, support over 350 wildlife species, and provide important ecosystem services that include stabilizing the economies of western communities. Impacts to sagebrush ecosystem processes over large areas due to the annual grass-wildfire cycle necessitated the development of a coordinated, science-based strategy for improving efforts to achieve long-term protection, conservation, and restoration of sagebrush rangelands, which was framed in 2015 under the Integrated Rangeland Fire Management Strategy (IRFMS). Central to this effort was the development of an Actionable Science Plan (Plan) that identified 37 priority science needs (Needs) for informing the actions proposed under the 5 topics (Fire, Invasives, Restoration, Sagebrush and Sage-Grouse, Climate and Weather) that were part of the collective focus of the IRFMS. Notable keys to this effort were identification of the Needs co-produced by managers and researchers, and a focus on resulting science being \u201cactionable.\u201dSubstantial investments aimed at fulfilling the Needs identified in the Plan have been made since its release in 2016. While the state of the science has advanced considerably, the extent to which knowledge gaps remain relative to identified Needs is relatively unknown. Moreover, new Needs have likely emerged since the original strategy as results from actionable science reveal new questions and possible (yet untested) solutions. A quantifiable assessment of the progress made on the original science Needs can identify unresolved gaps and new information that can help inform prioritization of future research efforts.This report details a systematic literature review that evaluated how well peer-reviewed journal articles and formal technical reports published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, addressed six needs (hereinafter \u201cNeeds\u201d) identified under the Invasives topic in the Plan. The topic outlined research Needs related to the control of invasive plant species in sagebrush rangelands, with a special emphasis on invasive annual grasses. We established the level of progress towards addressing each Need following a standardized set of criteria, and developed summaries detailing how research objectives nested within Needs identified in the Plan (\u201cNext Steps\u201d) were either addressed well, partially addressed, or remain outstanding (that is, addressed poorly) in the literature through 2020. Our searches resulted in the inclusion of 198 science products that at least partially addressed a Need identified in the Invasives topic. The Needs that were well and partially addressed included:studies of natural and anthropogenic factors influencing the distribution and spread;methods of preventing, eradicating and controlling invasive plant species;development of mapping techniques that provide regularly updated annual grass and fine fuel projections; andassessment of the efficacy of potential cheatgrass biocontrol agents.Needs that were addressed poorly included (1) investigations of livestock grazing as a tool for managing invasive plants and (2) investigations of cheatgrass die-offs and identification and subsequent study of potential biocontrol agents associated with those die-offs. The information provided in this assessment will assist updating the Plan along with other science strategies.", "description": "vii, 33 p.", "publisher": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"}, "author": [{"@type": "Person", "name": "Wiechman, Lief A.", "givenName": "Lief A.", "familyName": "Wiechman", "identifier": {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "ORCID", "value": "0000-0002-3804-4426", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3804-4426"}, "affiliation": [{"@type": "Organization", "name": "Fort Collins Science Center", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/fort-collins-science-center"}]}, {"@type": "Person", "name": "Anthony, Christopher R.", "givenName": "Christopher R.", "familyName": "Anthony", "identifier": {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "ORCID", "value": "0000-0003-0968-224X", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-224X"}, "affiliation": [{"@type": "Organization", "name": "Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/forest-and-rangeland-ecosystem-science-center"}]}, {"@type": "Person", "name": "Holloran, Matthew J", "givenName": "Matthew J", "familyName": "Holloran", "identifier": {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "ORCID", "value": "0000-0001-5244-770X", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5244-770X"}, "affiliation": [{"@type": "Organization", "name": "Operational Conservation LLC"}]}, {"@type": "Person", "name": "Ricca, Mark A. mark_ricca@usgs.gov", "givenName": "Mark A.", "familyName": "Ricca", "email": "mark_ricca@usgs.gov", "identifier": {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "ORCID", "value": "0000-0003-1576-513X", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-513X"}, "affiliation": [{"@type": "Organization", "name": "Western Ecological Research Center", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/werc"}]}, {"@type": "Person", "name": "Hanser, Steven E. shanser@usgs.gov", "givenName": "Steven E.", "familyName": "Hanser", "email": "shanser@usgs.gov", "identifier": {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "ORCID", "value": "0000-0002-4430-2073", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4430-2073"}, "affiliation": [{"@type": "Organization", "name": "Forest and Rangeland Ecosys Science Center", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/forest-and-rangeland-ecosystem-science-center"}]}, {"@type": "Person", "name": "Phillips, Sue L. sue_phillips@usgs.gov", "givenName": "Sue L.", "familyName": "Phillips", "email": "sue_phillips@usgs.gov", "identifier": {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "ORCID", "value": "0000-0002-5891-8485", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5891-8485"}, "affiliation": [{"@type": "Organization", "name": "Forest and Rangeland Ecosys Science Center"}]}, {"@type": "Person", "name": "Steblein, Paul F.", "givenName": "Paul F.", "familyName": "Steblein", "identifier": {"@type": "PropertyValue", "propertyID": "ORCID", "value": "0000-0001-7856-5106", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-5106"}, "affiliation": [{"@type": "Organization", "name": "Office of the AD Ecosystems", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/mission-areas/ecosystems"}]}], "funder": [{"@type": "Organization", "name": "Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/forest-and-rangeland-ecosystem-science-center"}, {"@type": "Organization", "name": "Fort Collins Science Center", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/fort-collins-science-center"}, {"@type": "Organization", "name": "Office of the AD Ecosystems", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/mission-areas/ecosystems"}, {"@type": "Organization", "name": "Western Ecological Research Center", "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/werc"}], "spatialCoverage": [{"@type": "Place", "additionalType": "country", "name": "United States", "url": "https://geonames.org/6252001"}, {"@type": "Place", "additionalType": "unknown", "name": "western United States"}, {"@type": "Place", "geo": [{"@type": "GeoShape", "additionalProperty": {"@type": "PropertyValue", "name": "GeoJSON", "value": {"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [{"type": "Feature", "properties": {}, "geometry": {"coordinates": [[[-102.82114253002419, 48.983205061126796], [-122.41445472125756, 48.983205061126796], [-122.41445472125756, 34.5], [-102.82114253002419, 34.5], [-102.82114253002419, 48.983205061126796]]], "type": "Polygon"}}]}}}, {"@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": 41.7416025305634, "longitude": -112.6177986256409}]}]}
Loss and degradation of sagebrush rangelands due to an accelerated invasive annual grass-wildfire cycle and other stressors are significant management, conservation, and economic issues in the western United States. These sagebrush rangelands comprise a unique biome spanning 11 states, support over 350 wildlife species, and provide important ecosystem services that include stabilizing the economies of western communities. Impacts to sagebrush ecosystem processes over large areas due to the annual grass-wildfire cycle necessitated the development of a coordinated, science-based strategy for improving efforts to achieve long-term protection, conservation, and restoration of sagebrush rangelands, which was framed in 2015 under the Integrated Rangeland Fire Management Strategy (IRFMS). Central to this effort was the development of an Actionable Science Plan (Plan) that identified 37 priority science needs (Needs) for informing the actions proposed under the 5 topics (Fire, Invasives, Restoration, Sagebrush and Sage-Grouse, Climate and Weather) that were part of the collective focus of the IRFMS. Notable keys to this effort were identification of the Needs co-produced by managers and researchers, and a focus on resulting science being “actionable.
 
Substantial investments aimed at fulfilling the Needs identified in the Plan have been made since its release in 2016. While the state of the science has advanced considerably, the extent to which knowledge gaps remain relative to identified Needs is relatively unknown. Moreover, new Needs have likely emerged since the original strategy as results from actionable science reveal new questions and possible (yet untested) solutions. A quantifiable assessment of the progress made on the original science Needs can identify unresolved gaps and new information that can help inform prioritization of future research efforts.
 
This report details a systematic literature review that evaluated how well peer-reviewed journal articles and formal technical reports published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, addressed six needs (hereinafter “Needs”) identified under the Invasives topic in the Plan. The topic outlined research Needs related to the control of invasive plant species in sagebrush rangelands, with a special emphasis on invasive annual grasses. We established the level of progress towards addressing each Need following a standardized set of criteria, and developed summaries detailing how research objectives nested within Needs identified in the Plan (“Next Steps”) were either addressed well, partially addressed, or remain outstanding (that is, addressed poorly) in the literature through 2020. Our searches resulted in the inclusion of 198 science products that at least partially addressed a Need identified in the Invasives topic. The Needs that were well and partially addressed included:
 
# studies of natural and anthropogenic factors influencing the distribution and spread;
# methods of preventing, eradicating and controlling invasive plant species;
# development of mapping techniques that provide regularly updated annual grass and fine fuel projections; and
# assessment of the efficacy of potential cheatgrass biocontrol agents.
 
Needs that were addressed poorly included (1) investigations of livestock grazing as a tool for managing invasive plants and (2) investigations of cheatgrass die-offs and identification and subsequent study of potential biocontrol agents associated with those die-offs. The information provided in this assessment will assist updating the Plan along with other science strategies.
 
== Table of Contents ==
* Acknowledgments
* Abstract
* Introduction
* Methods
* Results and Summary
* References Cited
* Glossary
* Appendix 1