Item talk:Q312281

From geokb

{

 "USGS Publications Warehouse": {
   "@context": "https://schema.org",
   "@type": "Article",
   "additionalType": "Journal Article",
   "name": "The \u201cAnthropocene\u201d epoch: Scientific decision or political statement?",
   "identifier": [
     {
       "@type": "PropertyValue",
       "propertyID": "USGS Publications Warehouse IndexID",
       "value": "70168782",
       "url": "https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70168782"
     },
     {
       "@type": "PropertyValue",
       "propertyID": "USGS Publications Warehouse Internal ID",
       "value": 70168782
     },
     {
       "@type": "PropertyValue",
       "propertyID": "DOI",
       "value": "10.1130/GSATG270A.1",
       "url": "https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG270A.1"
     }
   ],
   "journal": {
     "@type": "Periodical",
     "name": "GSA Today",
     "volumeNumber": "26",
     "issueNumber": "3"
   },
   "inLanguage": "en",
   "isPartOf": [
     {
       "@type": "CreativeWorkSeries",
       "name": "GSA Today"
     }
   ],
   "datePublished": "2016",
   "dateModified": "2016-03-02",
   "abstract": "The proposal for the \u201cAnthropocene\u201d epoch as a formal unit of the geologic time scale has received extensive attention in scientific and public media. However, most articles on the Anthropocene misrepresent the nature of the units of the International Chronostratigraphic Chart, which is produced by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) and serves as the basis for the geologic time scale. The stratigraphic record of the Anthropocene is minimal, especially with its recently proposed beginning in 1945; it is that of a human lifespan, and that definition relegates considerable anthropogenic change to a \u201cpre-Anthropocene.\u201d The utility of the Anthropocene requires careful consideration by its various potential users. Its concept is fundamentally different from the chronostratigraphic units that are established by ICS in that the documentation and study of the human impact on the Earth system are based more on direct human observation than on a stratigraphic record. The drive to officially recognize the Anthropocene may, in fact, be political rather than scientific.",
   "description": "2 p.",
   "publisher": {
     "@type": "Organization",
     "name": "Geological Society of America"
   },
   "author": [
     {
       "@type": "Person",
       "name": "Edwards, Lucy E. leedward@usgs.gov",
       "givenName": "Lucy E.",
       "familyName": "Edwards",
       "email": "leedward@usgs.gov",
       "identifier": {
         "@type": "PropertyValue",
         "propertyID": "ORCID",
         "value": "0000-0003-4075-3317",
         "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-3317"
       },
       "affiliation": [
         {
           "@type": "Organization",
           "name": "Florence Bascom Geoscience Center",
           "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/florence-bascom-geoscience-center"
         },
         {
           "@type": "Organization",
           "name": "Eastern Geology and Paleoclimate Science Center",
           "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/florence-bascom-geoscience-center"
         }
       ]
     },
     {
       "@type": "Person",
       "name": "Finney, Stanley C.",
       "givenName": "Stanley C.",
       "familyName": "Finney",
       "affiliation": [
         {
           "@type": "Organization",
           "name": "California State University at Long Beach"
         }
       ]
     }
   ],
   "funder": [
     {
       "@type": "Organization",
       "name": "Eastern Geology and Paleoclimate Science Center",
       "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/florence-bascom-geoscience-center"
     }
   ]
 }

}