Item talk:Q307791

{

 "USGS Publications Warehouse": {
   "@context": "https://schema.org",
   "@type": "Article",
   "additionalType": "Journal Article",
   "name": "A field test of the extent of bias in selection estimates after accounting for emigration",
   "identifier": [
     {
       "@type": "PropertyValue",
       "propertyID": "USGS Publications Warehouse IndexID",
       "value": "70029567",
       "url": "https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70029567"
     },
     {
       "@type": "PropertyValue",
       "propertyID": "USGS Publications Warehouse Internal ID",
       "value": 70029567
     },
     {
       "@type": "PropertyValue",
       "propertyID": "ISSN",
       "value": "15220613"
     }
   ],
   "journal": {
     "@type": "Periodical",
     "name": "Evolutionary Ecology Research",
     "volumeNumber": "7",
     "issueNumber": "4"
   },
   "inLanguage": "en",
   "isPartOf": [
     {
       "@type": "CreativeWorkSeries",
       "name": "Evolutionary Ecology Research"
     }
   ],
   "datePublished": "2005",
   "dateModified": "2012-03-12",
   "abstract": "Question: To what extent does trait-dependent emigration bias selection estimates in a natural system? Organisms: Two freshwater cohorts of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) juveniles. Field site: A 1 km stretch of a small stream (West Brook) in western Massachusetts. USA from which emigration could be detected continuously. Methods: Estimated viability selection differentials for body size either including or ignoring emigration (include = emigrants survived interval, ignore = emigrants did not survive interval) for 12 intervals. Results: Seasonally variable size-related emigration from our study site generated variable levels of bias in selection estimates for body size. The magnitude of this bias was closely related with the extent of size-dependent emigration during each interval. Including or ignoring the effects of emigration changed the significance of selection estimates in 5 of the 12 intervals, and changed the estimated direction of selection in 4 of the 12 intervals. These results indicate the extent to which inferences about selection in a natural system can be biased by failing to account for trait-dependent emigration. ?? 2005 Benjamin H. Letcher.",
   "publisher": {
     "@type": "Organization",
     "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
   },
   "author": [
     {
       "@type": "Person",
       "name": "Horton, G.E.",
       "givenName": "G.E.",
       "familyName": "Horton"
     },
     {
       "@type": "Person",
       "name": "O'Donnell, M. J.",
       "givenName": "M. J.",
       "familyName": "O'Donnell",
       "identifier": {
         "@type": "PropertyValue",
         "propertyID": "ORCID",
         "value": "0000-0002-9089-2377",
         "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9089-2377"
       },
       "affiliation": [
         {
           "@type": "Organization",
           "name": "Leetown Science Center",
           "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eesc"
         }
       ]
     },
     {
       "@type": "Person",
       "name": "Letcher, B. H.",
       "givenName": "B. H.",
       "familyName": "Letcher",
       "identifier": {
         "@type": "PropertyValue",
         "propertyID": "ORCID",
         "value": "0000-0003-0191-5678",
         "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-5678"
       },
       "affiliation": [
         {
           "@type": "Organization",
           "name": "Leetown Science Center",
           "url": "https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eesc"
         }
       ]
     },
     {
       "@type": "Person",
       "name": "Dubreuil, T.L.",
       "givenName": "T.L.",
       "familyName": "Dubreuil"
     }
   ]
 }

}