The following pages link to Brad Aagaard (Q44385):
Displayed 48 items.
- Science plan for improving three-dimensional seismic velocity models in the San Francisco Bay region, 2019–24 (Q56628) (← links)
- Integrate urban‐scale seismic hazard analyses with the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model (Q145182) (← links)
- 2021 Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics Developers Workshop (Q146296) (← links)
- The Mw6.0 24 August 2014 South Napa earthquake (Q148189) (← links)
- Effects of fault dip and slip rake angles on near-source ground motions: Why rupture directivity was minimal in the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake (Q148496) (← links)
- Ground-motion modeling of Hayward fault scenario earthquakes, part I: Construction of the suite of scenarios (Q148742) (← links)
- 2022 Crustal Deformation Modeling Workshop Report (Q150273) (← links)
- Implementation of basin models and sediment depth terms in the 2023 update of the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model: Example from Reno, Nevada (Q150648) (← links)
- Fault interactions and large complex earthquakes in the Los Angeles area (Q154272) (← links)
- Crustal Characterization (Q227073) (← links)
- Subsurface geometry of the San Andreas fault in southern California: Results from the Salton Seismic Imaging Project (SSIP) and strong ground motion expectations (Q238860) (← links)
- Basin structure beneath the Santa Rosa Plain, Northern California: Implications for damage caused by the 1969 Santa Rosa and 1906 San Francisco earthquakes (Q242495) (← links)
- A domain decomposition approach to implementing fault slip in finite-element models of quasi-static and dynamic crustal deformation (Q243163) (← links)
- Probabilistic estimates of surface coseismic slip and afterslip for Hayward fault earthquakes (Q245709) (← links)
- Ground-motion modeling of Hayward fault scenario earthquakes, part II: Simulation of long-period and broadband ground motions (Q247800) (← links)
- Near-source ground motions from simulations of sustained intersonic and supersonic fault ruptures (Q248398) (← links)
- Dynamic rupture modeling of the transition from thrust to strike-slip motion in the 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska (Q249089) (← links)
- Teleseismic body waves from dynamically rupturing shallow thrust faults: Are they opaque for surface-reflected phases? (Q249873) (← links)
- Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake (Q250208) (← links)
- Verifying a computational method for predicting extreme ground motion (Q251175) (← links)
- Testing long-period ground-motion simulations of scenario earthquakes using the Mw 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah mainshock: Evaluation of finite-fault rupture characterization and 3D seismic velocity models (Q251230) (← links)
- Visualizing the ground motions of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake (Q251978) (← links)
- Ground-motion modeling of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, part I: Validation using the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake (Q252147) (← links)
- Long-period building response to earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area (Q252264) (← links)
- Ground-motion modeling of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, part II: Ground-motion estimates for the 1906 earthquake and scenario events (Q252740) (← links)
- The 1906 San Francisco earthquake a century later: Introduction to the special section (Q253063) (← links)
- The 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence ground motions: Processed records and derived intensity metrics (Q253346) (← links)
- Improving the Development Pipelines for USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Real-Time and Scenario Products (Q259239) (← links)
- Multiphysics modelling in PyLith: Poroelasticity (Q271817) (← links)
- Constraining fault constitutive behavior with slip and stress heterogeneity (Q288314) (← links)
- A suite of exercises for verifying dynamic earthquake rupture codes (Q289698) (← links)
- Empirical ground-motion basin response in the California Great Valley, Reno, Nevada, and Portland, Oregon (Q291127) (← links)
- 2023 PyLith Hackathon report (Q292500) (← links)
- The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications (Q299766) (← links)
- COSMOS Ground-Motion Simulation Working Group workshops #1 and #2 (Q301809) (← links)
- Recent applications of the USGS National Crustal Model for Seismic Hazard Studies (Q304794) (← links)
- Broadband simulations for Mw 7.8 southern san andreas earthquakes: Ground motion sensitivity to rupture speed (Q307631) (← links)
- The SCEC/USGS dynamic earthquake rupture code verification exercise (Q313155) (← links)
- San Francisco Bay region 3D seismic velocity model v21.1 (Q318223) (← links)
- USGS Automated Ground Motion Processing Software version 2 (Q318993) (← links)
- Data Release for the 2023 U.S. 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model - Overview (Q319660) (← links)
- Ground-motion records and basin depth models for the Great Valley, California, 2000-2022 (Q319709) (← links)
- Ground-motion records and basin depth models for Reno, Nevada, 2008-2022 (Q319710) (← links)
- Ground-motion records and basin depth models for Portland, Oregon, 2005-2022 (Q319713) (← links)
- USGS automated ground motion processing software (Q325468) (← links)
- Ground motions from the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence (Q325500) (← links)
- San Francisco Bay region 3D seismic velocity model v21.0 (Q326685) (← links)
- PyLith (Q336608) (← links)