Should ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal/parallel or maximum direction for response history analysis of buildings? (Q61537): Difference between revisions

From geokb
(‎Changed an Item: Added links to content for publication)
(‎Changed label, description and/or aliases in en, and other parts: Created/Updated item from PW record translated to schema.org)
aliases / en / 0aliases / en / 0
 
ofr20121261
description / endescription / en
Should ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal/parallel or maximum direction for response history analysis of buildings?; 2012; OFR; 2012-1261; Reyes, Juan C.; Kalkan, Erol
USGS Numbered Series published by U.S. Geological Survey in 2012
Property / publication date
2012
Timestamp+2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 year
Before0
After0
 
Property / publication date: 2012 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / publication date: 2012 / reference
 
Property / publication date
 
15 July 2012
Timestamp+2012-07-15T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 day
Before0
After0
Property / publication date: 15 July 2012 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 22:06, 15 July 2024

USGS Numbered Series published by U.S. Geological Survey in 2012
  • ofr20121261
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Should ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal/parallel or maximum direction for response history analysis of buildings?
USGS Numbered Series published by U.S. Geological Survey in 2012
  • ofr20121261

Statements